Suchergebnisse

The article deals with the communicative interaction between the participants of political debates, which is characterized by the fact that the candidates keep to the norms of cooperative behavior. The aim of the article is to study the communicative strategies of agreement and disagreement in the framework of direct cooperative response intentionality and to describe the tactics of expression of direct cooperative agreement and disagreement used by the participants of political debates to realize a certain strategy and to achieve the necessary pragmatic aims. According to the analysis of the texts of English political debates, the strategy of disagreement can be used by communicators along with the strategy of agreement within the framework of direct cooperative response intentionality. The strategies of agreement and disagreement prevail in political debates. ; В статье рассматривается кооперативное взаимодействие участников политических дебатов.

Nowadays philologists show a special interest in the question of what is the real basis of discursive be-havior of speakers and ensures their harmonious or non-harmonious interaction with others in various communicative situa-tions. The article addresses the issue of non-cooperative (aggressive) interaction between participants of political debates, and specifically response utterances of communicators with direct and indirect response intentionality, characterized by deviations from the established rules and norms of cooperative behavior. The plane of content of a direct response utterance, in case it is true, always coincides with the plane of its expression, whereas an indirect response utterance contains a direct meaning and an additional implicit meaning. The aim of the study is to systematize the tactics of expression of direct and indirect verbal aggression used by participants of political debates to realize certain strategies and pragmatic goals in the course of non-cooperative interaction. ; В статье рассматривается агрессивное взаимодействие участников политических дебатов.